User talk:CircularReasoning

From RationalWiki
(Redirected from User talk:BadPiggies 9)
Jump to: navigation, search
This beautiful troll enjoys your attention you're giving it.
This user enjoys a troll-free talk page. Do not respond. Revert away (optionally rev-delete), unless the comment is amusing. Is corn grass?[1]

This page is automatically archived by Archiver
Archives for this talk page: <1>

Moderator eligibility guidelines[edit]

Please remember to read RationalWiki:Moderator elections/Nominations before nominating users for modship as I am actually ineligible, having edited for <6 months. — pythoncoder  (talk | contribs) 21:26, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

You're welcome[edit]

I think being the biggest prick around who also demoted you, you should at least give a little credit to the King of Douches, am I right? Of course I am.--Byron Wannabe (talk) 12:02, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

@Don Juan So soon? I thought their ruling on my edit-war drama episode last month was to wait for a few months of me making some quality edits before giving me the mop back? Anyway, thx. I solemnly swear to never abuse my largely defensive weapon of banhammer again. Stalk meCircularReasoningPrototype lab 02:25, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Another anti-atheist website[edit]

Hey, I found another heavily anti-atheist wingnut website. Here it is. Incoming article. TheEOE (talk) 22:11, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

A draft has been created, but I still need to work on it. TheEOE (talk) 22:39, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
@TheEOE Awesome. I’ll help you when I can. Stalk meCircularReasoningPrototype lab 07:46, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Largely defensive weapon of mop[edit]

I think this is a good enough time for me to restore your mop as long as you pinky-promise not to misuse it. DuceMoosoliniYour friendly RW dictator moderator 18:44, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Thx I will not! Stalk meCircularReasoningPrototype lab 00:12, 20 December 2018 (UTC)


Template:Ken debate20,000.00 USD only? That's peanuts!
See also: Atheism and uncharitableness, etc., etc.

t 14:15, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

You're absolutely right, @Joaquín Martínez. Doesn't seem to be enough. How much do you think the real  K e n  D o l l  would charge for a "debate"? If he really does have as much machismo as he repeatedly insists he has, then he would have raised the price to, I dunno, the price you put in the header? But then again:
It’s because the man is a coward. A craven cur with a yellow streak wider than the Yangtze River. A mental midget, with the debating skills of a newt. He is possessed of a liver that even the most lily-livered of chickens would disown.
~We Couldn't Make This Up
--Goatspeed. How's my editingCircularReasoningSteal my ideas 02:01, 15 January 2019 (UTC)