RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

SJWiki

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Red x.svg An editor believes that this article should be deleted. The reason given is "Nobody's voted to keep this yet."
Please discuss this assassination attempt on this article's entry on the Articles for deletion page.

Check our privilege
Social justice
Icon SJ.svg
Not ALL of our articles
Someone is wrong on
The Internet
Icon internet.svg
Log in:

SJWiki is a pet wiki project that was probably created in response to RationalWiki[citation needed] that focuses on social justice-related issues. Its name is a portmanteau of SJW and wiki.

How it all started[edit]

One day, a few of our very own users were fed-up with how RationalWiki does not focus enough on "social justice" issues.[citation needed] We do cover social justice issues quite extensively, as indicated in the articles in Category:Social justice. Here is a statement from one of the future SJWikians[citation needed] from June 1, 2014:[1]

Come on, if you’re editing something called RationalWiki, or more broadly engage with the “rationalist” and “skeptical” movements, it’s because you self declare yourself to be a “rationalist” or a “skeptic”. That can mean whatever the hell you want it to mean, but if it’s not going to be about making the world a better place then what is your fucking point of existing?

If you want to throw off the shackles of doctrine, dogma and religion, then why do so just so you can become more of an asshole?

So yes, I want to make the world a less toxic place for people who have been sidelined in the past. I’m not always successful, I’m not perfect, but that’s my aim, and I listen to the kind of people who might be able to guide me towards that intention. What the hell is wrong with that? These “gender issues” still impact on the world very much, and are areas where we – as the self-appointed intellectual superiors of the planet, it seems – can actually make a real difference.

The good[edit]

  • Their article on TERFs[2] (and this one has actually been copied and pasted into our TERF article cited by us). They also hold a pro-transgender stance (and in fact, quite a few of their sysops are trans themselves).
  • SJWiki holds a pro-feminist stance.
  • Furthermore, they are also quite anti-GamerGate.

The bad[edit]

Almost no articles[edit]

SJWiki has very few articles, with the wiki littered with red links probably remaining to be filled for quite some time.[4] According to their FAQ, articles are not meant to be edited by anyone in the general public:

Who can edit the wiki?
Anybody can apply to join us. We evaluate every application on a case-by-case basis. We withhold the right to deny anybody access to editing our wiki and/or having an account. This is because writing about social justice issues on SJWiki is not an activity that we offer to any member of the public. In the same way that a blog does not offer editing rights to its readers, we do not offer editing rights to all people who apply. This being said, we are using wiki software because it facilitates working together to write about and research topics over time and collaboratively. A blogging platform, while perhaps similar, would not have allowed us to easily edit articles communally nor to keep articles easily updated as things change. Social justice is about constantly adapting to new situations, learning, and supporting intersectional movements, as well as explain the history of how such things may have arisen.[5]

Liberapedia 2.0?[edit]

Here's hoping it doesn't turn into another Liberapedia. Hope has been misplaced: The site garners maybe 1 edit per week, if even that much.[6][better source needed]

External links[edit]

References[edit]