RationalWiki's 2019 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Information icon.svg The 2018 moderator election has started! We are electing 6 moderators and 2 alternatives to serve in 2019. Nominate users here and read their campaign slogans here!

Fun:Disproving creationism

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
This is a challenge article.
If you think that there is evidence for the topic of the page, please present it here. You'll be the first.

Scientists claim that creationism cannot be falsified and consequently is not science. This article includes all the arguments put forward by creationists showing how creationism could theoretically be disproven.

1. If God were to personally tell us that evolution is true and creation is not, creationism would be disproven. The Bible is the final authority, not God.

Two tumbleweeds rolling across the screen, from left to right.

See also[edit]