There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2020.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
| Someone is wrong on|
FunnyJunk and The Oatmeal about image hosting crap-site FunnyJunk in 2011 about stealing Inman's images without permission - FunnyJunk being a website notorious for that sort of thing. FunnyJunk responded with about as much maturity and decency as one might expect from a site where the entire business model is to slather advertising all over copyrighted content. A brief flame-war between the two sites would have been an end to it until Carreon got involved a year later. Representing FunnyJunk, Carreon threatened to sue Inman for defamation (for not updating his blog post from a full year earlier to reflect that FunnyJunk had taken down the many specific uploads he had listed) and attempted a $20,000 shakedown to make the problem go away. Inman's first response is best summed up as follows:
You want ME to pay YOU $20,000 for hosting MY unlicensed comics on YOUR shitty website for the last three years? No, I've got a better idea.
- I'm going to try and raise $20,000 in donations.
- I'm going to take a photo of the raised money.
- I'm going to mail that photo to you along with this picture of your mom seducing a kodiak bear.
- I'm going to donate one half of the money to the National Wildlife Association and the other half to the American Cancer Society.
Inman's "Operation Bear-Love Good Cancer Bad" campaign raised the $20,000 in 64 minutes, and had netted over $100,000 by the end of the first day. Despite his earlier experience with the Sex.com case, Charles seems to not have spent much time on the Internet, as he was bewildered by Inman's tactics. Carreon foreshadowed the clusterfuck of hilarity and butthurt that was to come in a quote given to Digital Life:
"I really did not expect that he would marshal an army of people who would besiege my website and send me a string of obscene emails," he says.
"I'm completely unfamiliar really with this style of responding to a legal threat — I've never really seen it before," Carreon explains. "I don't like seeing anyone referring to my mother as a sexual deviant," he added, referencing the drawing Inman posted.
The fact that Inman's letter was clearly directed to FunnyJunk and not Carreon himself is something Charles seems to have missed. He also falsely accused Inman of directing fans to contact Carreon – he seems to have never considered that the Internet might have risen up to smack him in the face on its own initiative without needing to be directed. (In fact, Inman later asked people not to contact or harass Carreon.) Curiously, this is the very tactic that Carreon's client, FunnyJunk, did about a year before.
Charles Takes Charge
At this point, the FunnyJunk aspect of the case was almost forgotten, and Carreon went pro se (aka, representing himself) and fucking nuts. Through the course of Carreon's legal complaints, the following were sued in one way or another:
- The American Cancer Society and the National Wildlife Association. Yes, he sued the charities for the money.
- Inman himself (obviously).
- IndieGoGo (the fundraising website) for breach of terms and conditions.
- An injunction against PayPal to stop the money being transferred - ostensibly to stop Inman mishandling or laundering the money, but everyone just knows it was to stop him taking the photo of it to humiliate Carreon. (spoiler alert, this didn't work.)
- Various unnamed people supposedly impersonating Carreon on Twitter.
Carreon dropped the case by the beginning of July, declaring "Mission Accomplished" before the judge could actually act on it and determine how many times he'd be hit with the Rule 11 stick (which is to say, fines for knowingly bringing a lawsuit that has no basis in law when he should've known better) and disbarment from the California bar.
The tastefully-named Rapeutation.com is a website started by Carreon and his wife. The initial post was a bizarre Christmas-themed (in the middle of July) music video called "Psycho Santa." The video  is said to be related to the controversy, but the Carreons seem to use the Timecube approach to context, sanity, and relevance in their posts, not to mention the fact that Tara Carreon apparently wants to "get rid of you ALL if I could. I wouldn't leave a one of you," referring to men.
In addition to the strange video, Rapeutation includes calls for substantial expansion of US defamation law for the "social media" era. Carreon defines a new acronym called "Distributed Internet Reputational Attack (DIRA)" and writes a rambling "legal analysis" calling for oppressive, litigious tools to be brought to bear on any criticism issued over the internet. Because when your outrage is irreparable, invent legislation to sue for it instead of ignoring it.
- Six-year battle over sex.com settled, The Sun-Herald
- The Oatmeal Blog - What should I do about FunnyJunk.com? (theoatmeal.com)
- The Oatmeal Blog - An update on the FunnyJunk situation
- The Oatmeal - FunnyJunk letter
- Digital Life - Cartoonist turns lawsuit threat into $100K charity fundraiser (digitallife.today.msnbc.msn.com)
- Charles Carreon Sues Matthew Inman... And The Charities He's Raising Money For
- The Oatmeal - As promised, here's the picture
- He's already been suspended once for stealing money from a client trust fund and practicing law in British Columbia without a license.
- Psycho Santa
- No, seriously. This is Tara Carreon's "scrapbook" forum where she's duplicated tons of comments and news stories (with no regard to copyright) about the Oatmeal/Carreon affair. Read with sanity goggles in their locked-on position.
- via Ars Technica. Also, don't miss the "go out with a BANG!" suicide (murder-suicide? double suicide? just nuts?) stuff.
- Distributed Internet Reputational Attack-Legal Analysis